Right to be forgotten: in search engines, aplicaciones in libraries, not

That there is something called right to be forgotten it was clear months ago, when the European courts recognized the power of citizens to request, under certain circumstances, search engines like Google root out from your search results whose information would adversely affect certain links them. But after answering that question they arose others, such as, for example, what about the third-party websites where information pointing to the results of the search engines are housed. Does the embarrassing information also must be removed from them?

The Spanish Supreme Court has just say no.
This week has rejected, as recorded by Efe news agency that the media have the obligation to erase their digital newspaper archives accessible, in most cases, to the Internet, the names and surnames of persons who have They have been convicted in the past for justice, even if they so request.

The Civil Chamber of the Supreme considered justified these same media take appropriate measures to ensure that the news disappear from the search engine results, but does not believe that should suppress your files. The right to digital oblivion, noted, does not cover each construct a measure passed, preventing the dissemination of information on facts that are not considered positive .

The Supreme was responding to the request of two people whose name appeared on online search engines linking to cases of drug trafficking and consumption in those who were involved in the eighties. Both asked that the information be removed from the archive of a national newspaper, because that was where the links pointing seekers. But the court has ruled that this measure would impose an excessive restriction of freedom of information.

Gradually, the right to digital oblivion is taking shape. After three and a half years of discussions, in early summer the justice and interior ministers of EU member countries approved the first general approach of the European Data Protection Regulation, which will, among other things, the right to be forgotten . Now this judgment of the Supreme could set a precedent for one of the issues, to many, most controversial right to forget: his collision with press freedom. It was also in Spain where the chain that led to the Luxembourg Court to recognize for the first time the right to forget last June began when Mario Costeja initiated in 2010 a lawsuit against Google Spain that eliminated its search results ad published in 1998 by the newspaper La Vanguardia, which appeared as the owner of several properties auctioned by an embargo derivative debt to Social Security.

aplicaciones circumstances, aplicaciones courts, aplicaciones discussions, aplicaciones engines, aplicaciones ministers, aplicaciones others, aplicaciones results, approved aplicaciones, considered aplicaciones, initiated aplicaciones, justified aplicaciones, recognized aplicaciones, rejected aplicaciones